What we've learned from integrating 13 clinics

5 min read
|
By
Dr Graham Denyer

Ōrākei Health becomes Tend Ōrākei in partnership with Ngāti Whātu. Ōrākei in May - our fourteenth clinic integration, and our first in partnership with iwi. But what does integration into the Tend network actually mean?

The conversation usually starts with technology. Indici. Clinical inboxes. AI scribing. The Tend app. Phone systems. Email. But after thirteen integrations we know that technology changes, while stressful, are not where the real challenges lie.

What we're doing is relatively unique in New Zealand general practice. This isn't a corporate roll-up where practices keep their own systems and standards while capitation flows to a parent entity. We fully integrate: one practice management system, one clinical governance framework, one technology platform, one data lake, one set of standards. That distinction matters because it means integration isn't a transaction. It's a culture change. And it requires genuine investment - not just in technology, but in our teams - to drive improvement for clinicians, patients and frontline staff.

What we find when we look closely

That culture change starts with visibility. When you bring practices onto a single platform with consistent clinical standards and transparent reporting, you see everything - including things that weren't visible before.

We have integrated practices that were high-performing, well-run and clinically strong. We have also, in the course of integration, discovered issues that had been hidden or unrecognised - in some cases serious. This is not a criticism of the people involved. It reflects a sector where some practices have operated in relative isolation, often without the systems or support to identify problems early. RNZCGP Foundation Standard is exactly that - a foundation.

I believe this transparency is one of the most important things we offer. You cannot improve what you cannot see. A quality and consistency ens applied across a network reveals patterns - both good and concerning - that it is difficult for any single practice, however well-intentioned, to identify in isolation.

The human cost of change

None of this diminishes the reality that integration is demanding. When a GP has spent fifteen years navigating the same system, built their own shortcuts, established their own rhythms with their team, asking them to change all of that is not a technology challenge. It is a psychological one. Tasks that once required no conscious thought suddenly demand active effort. And on thesame day the system changes, the clinic gets a new name, new patient channels and new processes. The simultaneity is significant.

We don't minimise this; we resource it. Our integration programme starts ten weeks before go-live: hardware audits, process mapping, in-clinic visits, progressive training and four hours of dedicated hands-on preparation the day before migration. For the first three weeks after, experienced Tend staff are physically on-site - GPs supporting GPs, nurses supporting nurses, admin supporting admin. These are people who have recently been through an integration themselves. Their presence is as much solidarity as supervisory. Dedicated app concierges work from the waiting room for two months, ensuring patients get unhurried support so admin staff are not expected to absorb that load on top of everything else.

Twelve months, not twelve weeks

The structured programme runs for weeks. The real adjustment takes twelve months or more. The operational improvements are measurable early. Our Central Clinical Team takes over repeat prescribing from day one, delivering a 56% reduction in administrative burden within the first month. Patient satisfaction always rises. A GP at one of our practices described her first post-integration leave as the first proper holiday she'd had in her career. The cultural shift takes longer. Learning to work within a network rather than as an autonomous unit. Accepting that transparent data will surface things that may be uncomfortable. Building trust that our purpose is genuine and the support structures are sustained. These are changes measured in months and quarters, not days.

A sample of outcomes post integration
Feedback from a recent integration
"To the superstars who have been our support crew, navigators, moral support and amazing new colleagues, a heartfelt thank you from the new Tend team in the South Island! Without you we would not have got through the past few weeks. Your honesty about this journey, letting us know there will be bumps and that days would be challenging, were wise words. A whole new world has been opened up to us. Thank you and we look forward to our Tend journey ahead!" - Nurse Lead Kirsty Sidebottom
Why this matters

We are not building a chain. We are building a network with shared standards, shared systems, and a shared commitment to quality and equity, with strong local leadership and decision making. That requires more than technology adoption. It requires a willingness to be open about what is working and what is not.

If you are a practice owner or clinical leader considering this conversation, I can tell you that the first months are demanding. But they are supported, structured and closely held. And the teams who have come through it consistently describe what follows as better - for them, for their patients, and for their working lives

Thirteen integrations in, we know what works. More importantly, we know it takes longer than any programme can deliver. The programme gets you through the transition. The culture is what makes it stick.